PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.48%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-14.48%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
219.35%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
219.35%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
311.06%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
975.86%
Positive EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
975.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
835.87%
OCF growth above 1.5x PAAS's 168.07%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
835.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x PAAS's 46.05%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
7.47%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 94.39%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
7.47%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
7.47%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 11.80%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-24.39%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while PAAS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-24.39%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-24.39%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.57%
AR growth well above PAAS's 31.49%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-6.58%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
4.06%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.07%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-148.44%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 21.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.