PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.55%
Revenue growth above 1.5x PAAS's 7.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
20.55%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 48.56%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-8.75%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 21.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-8.75%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 21.83%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-56.84%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 21.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-83.65%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 32.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-83.65%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 32.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.10%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-92.10%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
26.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 79.12%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
26.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
21.17%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.99%
We show growth while PAAS is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.10%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.57%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
300.27%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 11.90%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.