PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-8.81%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-8.81%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 58.80%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-197.39%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 92.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-197.39%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 92.31%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-197.36%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 91.95%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-198.04%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 91.93%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-198.04%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 91.93%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.39%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 126.11%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-92.39%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 33.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
13.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 1987.47%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
13.24%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
8.73%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.50%
AR growth well above PAAS's 7.24%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
7.03%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. PAAS's 63.75%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
3.74%
Asset growth well under 50% of PAAS's 94.72%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
3.49%
Under 50% of PAAS's 115.06%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.49%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.