PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
38.65%
Revenue growth above 1.5x PAAS's 8.14%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
38.65%
Positive gross profit growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
73.73%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
73.73%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
58.05%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
63.85%
Positive EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
63.85%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
98.32%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
98.32%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
82.36%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to PAAS's 78.40%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
82.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
36511827.79%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-150.28%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74837.44%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 51.99%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.79%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. PAAS's 34.76%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
25.00%
We show growth while PAAS is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
13.95%
Asset growth above 1.5x PAAS's 3.39%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
15.43%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-11.33%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
284.27%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 548.28%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.