PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.36%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 37.70%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
9.63%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 82.10%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
17.56%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
17.56%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
9.89%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
-5.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-15.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
10.37%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.65%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
20.16%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 1.13%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.69%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-3.69%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
24.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 360.78%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
25016083.82%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 141.79%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-0.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 157.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6533.86%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 347.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
505.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 201.01%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
133689.28%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
637.84%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
432.02%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 248.42%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
513.55%
AR growth well above PAAS's 36.09%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.07%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
38.01%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
111.86%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.