95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.50%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 10.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-7.30%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 2.34%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-5.62%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-5.62%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-16.06%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 29.34%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 29.17%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-11.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 30.43%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.34%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.11%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.70%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.65%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 11.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-2.65%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 26.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
141.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 281.13%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
124.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 343.46%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.43%
Below 50% of PAAS's 879.50%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-7.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 4167.78%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
622.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 177.60%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
229.95%
Below 50% of PAAS's 533.11%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
874.54%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 240.29%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
1188.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 411.99%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-88.33%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while PAAS is at 95.40%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.81%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 19.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.34%
Asset growth above 1.5x PAAS's 6.95%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.70%
Under 50% of PAAS's 5.99%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.