PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.79%
Revenue growth similar to PAAS's 30.18%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
45.14%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 36.57%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
50.25%
EBIT growth 75-90% of PAAS's 63.34%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
50.25%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of PAAS's 63.34%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
51.37%
Net income growth at 75-90% of PAAS's 60.03%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
36.36%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 30.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
36.36%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 30.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
9.22%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 22.31%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
9.14%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 22.10%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.41%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 40.73%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
140.85%
FCF growth above 1.5x PAAS's 39.40%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
235.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 464.10%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
179.18%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
33.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to PAAS's 33.43%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
399.61%
Below 50% of PAAS's 1149.34%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
53.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 178.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 11.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
37.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 200.44%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
73.36%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 87.31%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 6.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 83.38%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.17%
We have a declining book value while PAAS shows 33.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-52.05%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 2058.67%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PAAS's 48.18%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.