95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.28%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 9.52%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-17.67%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 18.45%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-6.08%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 38.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.08%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 38.31%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
30.00%
Net income growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 57.84%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
75.00%
EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 550.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
75.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 550.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.40%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.45%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.29%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.22%
OCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 43.57%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
5.22%
FCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 66.97%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
210.94%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 644.25%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
149.23%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 235.88%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
51.45%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 31.22%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1261.50%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 3316.61%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
330.54%
Below 50% of PAAS's 858.32%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
67.97%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 128.98%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
426.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 674.53%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
133.14%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1497.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 670.00%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
453.49%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 219.93%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
68.14%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 76.97%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.44%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.67%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 2.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
6.55%
BV/share growth above 1.5x PAAS's 2.31%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-5.88%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-19.14%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.