PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.75%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
14.32%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 44.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
24.60%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PAAS's 10.27%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
24.60%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PAAS's 10.27%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-0.65%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 98.67%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
94.44%
EPS growth similar to PAAS's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
88.89%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x PAAS's 39.53%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.02%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
12.57%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
118459836.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 1248.03%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
221.54%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 163.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
104.46%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 28.65%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
6300.31%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 569.82%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
379.59%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to PAAS's 400.33%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
143.26%
3Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 124.39%. Bruce Berkowitz might see if strategic cost controls or product mix drove recent gains.
122932.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 2021.95% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
363.33%
Below 50% of PAAS's 2211.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
176.77%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 124.47%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
215.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 251.93%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
86.01%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 54.70%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.31%
AR growth well above PAAS's 20.11%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.63%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.84%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.66%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.35%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.