PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.05%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 7.75%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
4.81%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 15.44%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
3.70%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.70%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
1.68%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.44%
Positive EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 47.90%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
0.08%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
0.03%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
723.13%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to PAAS's 724.56%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
182.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 245.78%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
306.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 160.34%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
640.28%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 742.14%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
242.27%
Below 50% of PAAS's 1100.56%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
441.69%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 657.31%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
581.35%
Below 50% of PAAS's 1507.01%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
268.71%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 77.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
644.65%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 504.52%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
3089.26%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 1240.74%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
147.25%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 272.29%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
86.70%
Below 50% of PAAS's 177.18%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.82%
AR growth well above PAAS's 24.27%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.65%
Asset growth well under 50% of PAAS's 75.96%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.10%
Under 50% of PAAS's 71.07%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-9.08%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 165.84%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.17%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 7.62%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.