Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 46.28%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.

Reduced diluted shares while PAAS is at 48.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 369.16%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.

5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 25.92%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.

3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 2.24%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 17.54%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 1056.87% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.

5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 18.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.

3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 144.28%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 806.24%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 4.02%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 11.97%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.