95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
78.11%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
56.56%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x PAAS's 24.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
56.27%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
56.27%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
48.49%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
47.06%
Positive EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
47.06%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.14%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 1.29%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-30.00%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
97.45%
OCF growth above 1.5x PAAS's 2.64%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
149.53%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
747.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 579.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
260.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 44.79%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
206.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 12.19%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
10355.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 1583.56%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
365.07%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 53.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
245.68%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 9.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
9636.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 29.65% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
349.98%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
237.90%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3155.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 1527.72%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
150.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 128.04%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
74.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 41.73%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.01%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while PAAS stands at 2.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.69%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
4.28%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-12.48%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 17.99%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 1.02%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.