Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Slight or no buybacks while PAAS is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.

Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 105.96%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.

Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 608.89%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 86.40%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 23.46%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

Debt shrinking faster vs. PAAS's 27.52%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.