PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.29%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 21.63%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-0.43%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 789.72%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-0.43%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 113.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-0.43%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 113.65%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
8.35%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 107.59%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 107.32%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 107.32%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.26%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 1.27%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-61.46%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-5.26%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 8584.43%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
29250.87%
FCF growth above 1.5x PAAS's 93.58%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
369.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 520.49%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
194.35%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 43.34%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
73.48%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1883.30%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 2902.94%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
271.01%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
62.94%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1508.48%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 1353.77%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
165.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 17.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
7.72%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
3689.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 368.98%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
157.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 84.82%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
62.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 20.51%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.62%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.94%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-9.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.