PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.16%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-18.53%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-18.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-18.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-20.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.18%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.18%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.04%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.70%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 34.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
1085.59%
FCF growth 50-75% of PAAS's 1826.38%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
198.96%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 3.81%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-24.65%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
2800.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 4129.01%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
222.96%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-39.82%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1699.31%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
186.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-57.64%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
5331.89%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 256.31%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
123.30%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 54.29%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
41.24%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
317.42%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 399.39%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
57.80%
AR growth well above PAAS's 11.78%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.00%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.92%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.02%
We have some new debt while PAAS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.79%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 2.51%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.