PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.63%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
9.27%
Positive gross profit growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
9.27%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
9.27%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-92.92%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-94.44%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-94.44%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.20%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.19%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 1.27%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-60.06%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
17.39%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
8.48%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
107.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-11.70%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
154.13%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 3985.02%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
132.02%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-29.04%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
118.90%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-88.28%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-96.72%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
-65.69%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while PAAS stands at 252.08%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
91.18%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 47.15%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
40.25%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.67%
Below 50% of PAAS's 399.94%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-64.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.13%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.66%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.03%
Debt shrinking faster vs. PAAS's 19.48%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.