Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.

Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 146.04%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

Debt shrinking faster vs. PAAS's 5.53%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.