PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.00%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-1.07%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-1.07%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 43.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.07%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 43.24%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
8.72%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 62.20%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.98%
Share change of 8.98% while PAAS is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
8.94%
Diluted share change of 8.94% while PAAS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.62%
OCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 72.25%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
113.34%
FCF growth above 1.5x PAAS's 56.19%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
252.80%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to PAAS's 241.24%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
46.85%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-28.54%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
388.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 614.85%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
38.42%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-44.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 500.95%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
230.32%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-14.41%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-66.75%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
1009.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 153.17%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
105.03%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
37.47%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-52.64%
Negative near-term dividend growth while PAAS invests at 33.16%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
3.32%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-7.41%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-10.63%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.92%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.