95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
30.83%
Revenue growth above 1.5x PAAS's 2.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
16.30%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 70.11%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
2.77%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
2.77%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-76.45%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-75.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-75.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.35%
Share reduction while PAAS is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.35%
Reduced diluted shares while PAAS is at 0.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
6.53%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while PAAS cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
34.00%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-875.03%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
425.17%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 74.83%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
17.39%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-38.61%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
697.66%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 322.91%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-6.31%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-53.81%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-1205.32%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-220.54%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-183.76%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
619.11%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 123.76%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
60.71%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
17.50%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-37.65%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-43.68%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
12.44%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-4.09%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
126.58%
Debt growth far above PAAS's 3.29%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.75%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PAAS's 259.37%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.