PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.88%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 1.32%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
9.53%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 36.22%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
8.65%
EBIT growth below 50% of PAAS's 24.23%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
8.65%
Operating income growth under 50% of PAAS's 24.23%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
10.43%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 83.12%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
7.14%
EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 76.92%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.14%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 76.92%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.07%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 0.25%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 0.19%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.97%
OCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 11.24%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
4.72%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
141.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 26.80%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-20.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 0.70%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
8.81%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
124.63%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 17.82%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-42.27%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is at 927.89%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-1.57%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
48.42%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-61.72%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-13.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS is 741.33%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
238.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 30.35%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
41.60%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
16.36%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.46%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-5.82%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
13.77%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.47%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 1.08%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
1.03%
50-75% of PAAS's 1.99%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-10.43%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 6.78%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.14%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.