PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.68%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.02%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 6.78%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
0.37%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.37%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-1.53%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.02%
Diluted share change of 0.02% while PAAS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-29.69%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
3.56%
OCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 48.68%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
3.57%
FCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 597.87%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
157.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 8.37%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
0.79%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-0.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 5.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
139.61%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 57.51%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-19.65%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-13.05%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 64.56%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
74.58%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-55.47%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
1100.37%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 184.27%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
235.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 24.18%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
36.34%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
14.09%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.06%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
65.81%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while PAAS cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
56.16%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while PAAS stands at 5.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.01%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.66%
50-75% of PAAS's 0.93%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-10.39%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.14%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 6.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.