PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-17.85%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-10.34%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 27.35%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-14.45%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-14.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
149.47%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
148.39%
Positive EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
148.39%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 40.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-24.07%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-23.82%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
105.28%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-22.48%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
27.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 14.92%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
91.05%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-39.41%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is at 5.58%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
17.79%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 184.83%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
23.01%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-59.13%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PAAS is 132.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
15.47%
Below 50% of PAAS's 341.91%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
205.07%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 17.51%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
22.24%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
-6.81%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while PAAS is at 1.12%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-61.08%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 0.48%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.80%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.53%
Under 50% of PAAS's 2.73%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-13.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.86%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PAAS's 25.91%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.