PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.83%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.55%
Positive gross profit growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-10.38%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-10.38%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-79.93%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-81.25%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-81.25%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.17%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.03%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.23%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
1.54%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while PAAS cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
0.04%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
126.84%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
222.40%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 97.35%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-5.56%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-11.09%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 5.24%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
210.51%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 31325.63%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
-29.99%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-26.27%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
108.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-94.15%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PAAS is 78.54%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
103.66%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 52.50%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
254.23%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 15.89%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
23.55%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
12.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 15.02%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.85%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
77.66%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while PAAS cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
118.02%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.76%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-0.46%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-8.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.46%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.