PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.81%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 21.62%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.27%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 110.19%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-256.60%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-256.60%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-317.43%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-315.38%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 350.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-315.38%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 350.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.31%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 18.70%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 18.67%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.56%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 746.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8.06%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 132.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
205.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 5.78%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
2.32%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 1.90%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
-12.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 6.82%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
176.09%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 8.58%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-14.51%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is at 23.95%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-20.28%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-552.06%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-257.57%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while PAAS is 342.83%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-302.57%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
161.66%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 25.49%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
17.18%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
3.49%
Below 50% of PAAS's 31.37%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.77%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
69.37%
Below 50% of PAAS's 180.05%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-27.48%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 3.82%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-3.67%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 0.19%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-2.48%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-7.41%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 4.31%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.45%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 27.57%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.