PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.01%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 24.47%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
42.43%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 76.67%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
173.43%
EBIT growth above 1.5x PAAS's 94.63%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
173.43%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PAAS's 94.63%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
160.92%
Net income growth above 1.5x PAAS's 104.98%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
160.71%
EPS growth above 1.5x PAAS's 100.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
160.71%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x PAAS's 100.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.23%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.04%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.31%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.08%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-48.78%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
30.24%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
30.44%
FCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 85.79%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
124.83%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 23.61%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
8.13%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 42.85%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-5.44%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 9.49%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
119.98%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-5.19%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is at 54.53%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-13.15%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
58.76%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1255.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 234.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-9.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
121.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 23.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
15.88%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
3.35%
Below 50% of PAAS's 29.01%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.92%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
66.54%
Below 50% of PAAS's 179.93%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
156.25%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.29%
Asset growth well under 50% of PAAS's 0.99%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.52%
1.25-1.5x PAAS's 1.26%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
-7.47%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.56%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 8.80%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.