PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.92%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 20.40%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
42.28%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 157.43%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
51.76%
EBIT growth below 50% of PAAS's 541.78%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
51.76%
Operating income growth under 50% of PAAS's 541.78%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
41.64%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 227.67%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
37.50%
EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 210.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
37.50%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 210.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.11%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.43%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-55.10%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
50.27%
OCF growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 83.18%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
49.75%
FCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 134.82%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
153.70%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
80.52%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 35.99%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
48.97%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 14.76%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
148.05%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
106.30%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 152.37%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
73.89%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 31.32%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
65.93%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 16.07% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
240.67%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 170.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
121.59%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PAAS's 177.67%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
115.16%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
15.09%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 22.91%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
7.84%
Below 50% of PAAS's 21.40%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.78%
Stable or rising mid-term dividends while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees an edge in consistent payouts vs. the competitor.
0.17%
Below 50% of PAAS's 99.96%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
144.82%
AR growth well above PAAS's 1.57%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.70%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.37%
Similar to PAAS's 2.25%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
-23.76%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.17%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 18.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.