PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.85%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 43.29%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-8.30%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 10.12%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.75%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.75%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 57.40%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
4.90%
Net income growth under 50% of PAAS's 157.10%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
6.06%
EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 158.06%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
6.06%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of PAAS's 158.06%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.09%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.31%
Reduced diluted shares while PAAS is at 0.44%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
25.60%
Dividend growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 39.99%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in returning cash to shareholders.
-8.83%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 48.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-8.64%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 53.64%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
50.22%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 14.65%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
27.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 90.66%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
16.22%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 38.81%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
30.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 3.96%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
39.76%
Below 50% of PAAS's 426.12%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
24.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 56.80%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
0.37%
Below 50% of PAAS's 85.45%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
183.27%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to PAAS's 191.79%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
212.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 151.97%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
98.34%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
23.42%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 44.81%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
14.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 25.06%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
139.09%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 40.11%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
39.29%
Below 50% of PAAS's 179.98%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-3.56%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
238799900.00%
Inventory growth well above PAAS's 13.15%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-2.20%
Negative asset growth while PAAS invests at 3.92%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.85%
Under 50% of PAAS's 6.39%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-59.56%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.96%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 3.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.