PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
13.24%
Positive revenue growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.19%
Positive gross profit growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
7.00%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
7.00%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
3.04%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2.86%
Positive EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2.86%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
11.63%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-63.01%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
60.86%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
54.95%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 68.11%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
60.21%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 29.69%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
43.28%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
82.95%
Below 50% of PAAS's 2698.49%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
82.43%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
4.10%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
254.38%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
134.22%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
90.98%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
25.60%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 43.58%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
16.45%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 20.65%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while PAAS stands at 177.88%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.20%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-31.41%
Inventory is declining while PAAS stands at 12.90%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.48%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.90%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-98.25%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.98%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.