PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-18.59%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 20.47%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-16.62%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-15.52%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 7.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-15.52%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 7.87%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-18.77%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-18.92%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-18.92%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.05%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.11%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
-44.76%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 42.86%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-6.99%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 80.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
31.55%
FCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 295.56%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
13.95%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 7.09%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
12.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 42.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
42.63%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 78.77%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
-5.57%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
21.90%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 11.03%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
82.91%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 174.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-21.60%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
59.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
290.73%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 256.05%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
86.13%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
18.37%
Below 50% of PAAS's 38.53%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
14.03%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 21.84%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
323.53%
Similar 10Y dividend/share CAGR to PAAS's 299.94%. Walter Schloss expects both to share consistent earnings expansions and payout practices.
190.02%
Below 50% of PAAS's 699.78%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
66.46%
Below 50% of PAAS's 185.64%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-24.73%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 1.14%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
280.32%
We show growth while PAAS is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
1.09%
Asset growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.70%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
0.97%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-7.67%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.65%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.