PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.44%
Revenue growth above 1.5x PAAS's 4.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
19.36%
Positive gross profit growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
12.09%
EBIT growth below 50% of PAAS's 71.99%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
12.09%
Operating income growth under 50% of PAAS's 71.99%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
-46.04%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 445.15%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-46.15%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 414.29%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-46.15%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 414.29%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.13%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.05%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while PAAS stands at 20.01%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
7.81%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
251.29%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
20.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
51.97%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 60.69%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
34.55%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 58.54%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
0.77%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
71.89%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 29.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
75.55%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 546.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-16.12%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
151.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 186.70%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
170.60%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 92.81%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
80.17%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
24.93%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 36.86%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
19.74%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
118.73%
AR growth well above PAAS's 9.00%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-15.06%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.76%
Asset growth above 1.5x PAAS's 0.62%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.46%
75-90% of PAAS's 1.92%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
-6.09%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 2.58%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.24%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 31.96%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.