PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-27.76%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-37.06%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 31.16%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-31.50%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 19.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-31.50%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 19.25%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
31.79%
Net income growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 58.99%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
30.30%
EPS growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 58.54%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
30.30%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 58.54%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.05%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.01%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-52.12%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-25.13%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 161.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-43.96%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 71.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
6.31%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
5.48%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 29.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-3.20%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-5.92%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
17.09%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
7.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
28.59%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
188.77%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
155.80%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
72.43%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
26.47%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 16.82%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
24.52%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
24.20%
Below 50% of PAAS's 108.08%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
49.75%
Below 50% of PAAS's 316.03%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
70.16%
Below 50% of PAAS's 197.21%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
-31.31%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.56%
Inventory is declining while PAAS stands at 0.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.15%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.00%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-11.95%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 8.29%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.88%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.