PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.87%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 10.79%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
18.63%
Gross profit growth under 50% of PAAS's 260.85%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-2.88%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 108.33%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-2.88%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 108.33%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-15.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.95%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.95%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.09%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
7.85%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while PAAS cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
11.35%
Positive OCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
142.65%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-35.57%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 9.82%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-4.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 20.86%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
4.75%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-46.91%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
2.05%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
29.22%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-26.72%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
218.14%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
112.27%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
69.51%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
34.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 5.31%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
24.94%
Positive short-term equity growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
91.37%
10Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 101.54%. Bill Ackman might push for a stronger payout policy to match the competitor’s returns.
78.81%
Below 50% of PAAS's 303.17%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
77.13%
Below 50% of PAAS's 188.02%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
1.34%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. PAAS's 9.69%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-6.70%
Inventory is declining while PAAS stands at 7.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.62%
Asset growth above 1.5x PAAS's 1.53%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.51%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-8.41%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 231.32%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.71%
We expand SG&A while PAAS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.