PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.14%
Negative revenue growth while PAAS stands at 3.95%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.04%
Negative gross profit growth while PAAS is at 120.28%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1.06%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 616.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1.06%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 616.15%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-32.95%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 109.53%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-32.43%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 109.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-32.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 109.76%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.07%
Share count expansion well above PAAS's 0.05%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.08%
Diluted share count expanding well above PAAS's 0.06%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-21.46%
Negative OCF growth while PAAS is at 145.76%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-60.38%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 106.94%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-18.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 15.69%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
5.34%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 37.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-16.68%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 8.43%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-36.08%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS stands at 14.58%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
5.49%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 8.52%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
-24.69%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-34.59%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
60.03%
Positive 5Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
16.20%
Below 50% of PAAS's 121.26%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
65.46%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 33.13%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
35.36%
Below 50% of PAAS's 133.26%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
28.74%
Below 50% of PAAS's 109.18%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.98%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 23.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-37.75%
Inventory is declining while PAAS stands at 43.25%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.15%
Asset growth well under 50% of PAAS's 180.52%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.34%
Under 50% of PAAS's 149.37%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-10.20%
We’re deleveraging while PAAS stands at 423.29%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.88%
SG&A declining or stable vs. PAAS's 246.44%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.