PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.55%
Revenue growth under 50% of PAAS's 63.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
29.24%
Positive gross profit growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
37.10%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
37.10%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
26.98%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
28.00%
Positive EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
28.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.12%
Share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 72.98%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.09%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x PAAS's 72.96%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.79%
OCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 128.07%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
10.57%
Positive FCF growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
24.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 51.42%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
22.08%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to PAAS's 24.35%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
5.86%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 47.81%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
26.57%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 10264.30%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
46.48%
Positive OCF/share growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
32.07%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 7.46%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
55.82%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 89.58%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
-56.49%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
32.42%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
66.72%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
27.99%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with PAAS's 29.82%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
25.20%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 18.40%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
13.23%
Stable or rising dividend while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
101.95%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 199.64%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
59.08%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 102.68%. Martin Whitman might see a weaker short-term approach to distributing cash.
-26.61%
Firm’s AR is declining while PAAS shows 0.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-24.39%
Inventory is declining while PAAS stands at 0.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.37%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.38%
Positive BV/share change while PAAS is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
269.36%
We have some new debt while PAAS reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-18.96%
We cut SG&A while PAAS invests at 68.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.