PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.79%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-16.44%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-17.01%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 263.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-17.01%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 263.07%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-17.73%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 53.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-21.88%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 54.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-21.88%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 54.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.02%
Share change of 0.02% while PAAS is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.01%
Reduced diluted shares while PAAS is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-50.24%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-15.45%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-32.66%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 47.50%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
5.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 19.90%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
17.64%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 38.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-28.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS stands at 18.30%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
13.22%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 16.90%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
54.57%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 15.61%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
-25.62%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
18.59%
Positive 10Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
235.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 3.06%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-23.01%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
61.85%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
29.21%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with PAAS's 29.35%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
22.22%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 14.32%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
46.20%
Stable or rising dividend while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
91.79%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 183.33%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
76.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 98.39%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
57.36%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-50.99%
Inventory is declining while PAAS stands at 2.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
0.02%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-0.06%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-4.44%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.84%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.