PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
44.37%
Revenue growth above 1.5x PAAS's 8.65%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
43.20%
Gross profit growth similar to PAAS's 40.71%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
47.82%
Positive EBIT growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
47.82%
Positive operating income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
44.74%
Positive net income growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
52.00%
Positive EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
52.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.01%
Slight or no buybacks while PAAS is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.02%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
3.51%
Dividend growth under 50% of PAAS's 8.74%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
45.21%
Similar OCF growth to PAAS's 45.99%. Walter Schloss would assume comparable operations or industry factors.
-388.43%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 722.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
51.80%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to PAAS's 52.57%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
60.74%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 71.45%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
11.68%
Positive 3Y CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
57.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with PAAS's 58.87%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
124.71%
Below 50% of PAAS's 522.46%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
18.55%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
41.52%
Below 50% of PAAS's 92.31%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
2319.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 64.18%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
6.30%
Positive short-term CAGR while PAAS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
62.87%
Positive growth while PAAS is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
31.82%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 40.11%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
20.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 11.29%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
68.43%
Stable or rising dividend while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
95.52%
Below 50% of PAAS's 208.25%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.
45.29%
3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of PAAS's 54.10%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.
-1.94%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-43.80%
Inventory is declining while PAAS stands at 1.45%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.74%
Positive asset growth while PAAS is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
1.55%
50-75% of PAAS's 2.59%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-0.75%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.62%
SG&A growth well above PAAS's 23.33%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.