95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
23.44%
Revenue growth above 1.5x PAAS's 13.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
60.21%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x PAAS's 9.86%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-31.17%
Negative EBIT growth while PAAS is at 67.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-33.15%
Negative operating income growth while PAAS is at 67.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-43.00%
Negative net income growth while PAAS stands at 88.26%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-44.12%
Negative EPS growth while PAAS is at 87.50%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-44.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while PAAS is at 87.50%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.25%
Share reduction while PAAS is at 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while PAAS is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
0.19%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while PAAS cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
25.61%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 20.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
-8.90%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 24.37%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
121.58%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 108.60%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
68.26%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 16.41%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
35.77%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 11.87%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
177.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 13801.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
139.14%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 22.27%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
62.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 34.48%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
38.48%
Below 50% of PAAS's 108.53%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
12.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 19.67%. Martin Whitman might see a shortfall in operational efficiency or brand power.
-70.02%
Negative 3Y CAGR while PAAS is 344.17%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
63.53%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 25.60%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
34.54%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 10.29%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
15.29%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 3.56%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
235.15%
Stable or rising dividend while PAAS is cutting. John Neff sees a strong advantage in consistent shareholder returns vs. a struggling peer.
103.88%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 185.74%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
21.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 0.00%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
-47.47%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.52%
Asset growth at 50-75% of PAAS's 0.71%. Martin Whitman questions if the firm is lagging expansions or if the competitor invests more aggressively.
0.24%
Under 50% of PAAS's 1.53%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-8.70%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.