PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.97%
Revenue growth similar to PAAS's 6.74%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
10.64%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 7.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic sourcing or brand premium explains outperformance.
13.90%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 12.15%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
13.42%
Operating income growth above 1.5x PAAS's 4.99%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
15.07%
Net income growth comparable to PAAS's 14.00%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
14.29%
EPS growth similar to PAAS's 15.22%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
14.29%
Similar diluted EPS growth to PAAS's 15.22%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.04%
Slight or no buybacks while PAAS is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.05%
Slight or no buyback while PAAS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.01%
OCF growth under 50% of PAAS's 71.84%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
-74.72%
Negative FCF growth while PAAS is at 124.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
172.48%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 98.46%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
100.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to PAAS's 91.91%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
65.26%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 40.96%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
238.06%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 511.50%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
170.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to PAAS's 177.74%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
100.04%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of PAAS's 738.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
384.37%
Below 50% of PAAS's 1200.25%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
173.02%
Below 50% of PAAS's 456.17%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
95.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of PAAS's 164.41%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
53.97%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 37.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
40.97%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 20.66%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
19.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 16.90%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
282.43%
10Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x PAAS's 103.21%. David Dodd checks if the firm's robust cash flows justify outpacing the competitor's increases.
76.17%
5Y dividend/share CAGR at 50-75% of PAAS's 103.21%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging policy in mid-term shareholder returns.
25.66%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while PAAS cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
147.04%
Our AR growth while PAAS is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x PAAS's 2.38%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
3.43%
Similar to PAAS's 3.31%. Walter Schloss finds parallel capital usage or profit distribution strategies.
1.99%
Debt growth far above PAAS's 2.25%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-17.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.