PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
20.55%
Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
20.55%
Positive gross profit growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-8.75%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-8.75%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-56.84%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-83.65%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-83.65%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-92.10%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-92.10%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
26.10%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 1503.29%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
26.10%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 2625.59%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
21.17%
Positive 3Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.50%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.99%
Inventory growth of 2.99% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
1.10%
Asset growth well under 50% of RGLD's 69.80%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
1.57%
Under 50% of RGLD's 59.55%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
300.27%
SG&A growth well above RGLD's 54.98%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.