PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-199.50%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 18.44%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-199.50%
Negative gross profit growth while RGLD is at 18.28%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-251.32%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 31.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-251.32%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 31.99%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-511.39%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 29.57%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-511.27%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-511.27%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 27.27%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1856.19%
OCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 13.29%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
1856.19%
FCF growth above 1.5x RGLD's 12.84%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-278.69%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 4728.25%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-278.69%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 5211.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-36363820.17%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 255.64%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 438.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31219.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while RGLD is 602.06%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while RGLD shows 18.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-41.90%
Negative asset growth while RGLD invests at 2.53%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-33.48%
We have a declining book value while RGLD shows 2.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-100.00%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-190.08%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.