PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
19.82%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of RGLD's 27.42%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
26.25%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of RGLD's 29.76%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
25.56%
EBIT growth 50-75% of RGLD's 43.47%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
25.56%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of RGLD's 43.47%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
29.72%
Net income growth comparable to RGLD's 32.46%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
33.33%
EPS growth similar to RGLD's 32.26%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
33.33%
Similar diluted EPS growth to RGLD's 30.90%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
0.01%
Share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 0.51%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.53%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.57%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
79.67%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
79.67%
FCF growth under 50% of RGLD's 382.36%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
45.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 5110.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
-25.79%
Negative 5Y CAGR while RGLD stands at 216.85%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
24.33%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 88.09%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
569.66%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 5.90%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1286.38%
Positive short-term CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
283.77%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 193.98%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-44.91%
Firm’s AR is declining while RGLD shows 28.79%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.18%
Asset growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.53%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.26%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 2.04%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.59%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.