PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.05%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 28.16%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.94%
Negative gross profit growth while RGLD is at 26.88%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-8.75%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 46.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-8.75%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 46.65%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-8.35%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 65.36%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.09%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 66.22%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-10.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 64.63%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.36%
Share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 1.63%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.53%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 1.67%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.87%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-6.87%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 103.93%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
136.57%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 246.11%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
101.69%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 210.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1165.13%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 73.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1283.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 15.62%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3452.22%
Positive 5Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1028.99%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 109.48%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1193.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 778.84%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
1764.59%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 226.19%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.37%
AR growth well above RGLD's 38.78%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.81%
Asset growth well under 50% of RGLD's 22.84%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
6.28%
Under 50% of RGLD's 60.49%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.67%
SG&A growth well above RGLD's 1.73%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.