PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.50%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-7.30%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-5.62%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-5.62%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-16.06%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-10.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-11.11%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.34%
Share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 17.58%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.70%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 16.99%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.65%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 137.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-2.65%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 186.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
141.24%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 302.96%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
124.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 140.95%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
40.43%
Below 50% of RGLD's 178.60%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-7.79%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 104.27%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
622.91%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 152.02%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
229.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 60.35%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
874.54%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with RGLD's 935.16%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
1188.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 402.16%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
-88.33%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while RGLD is at 182.05%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.81%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
60.34%
Asset growth above 1.5x RGLD's 4.25%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.70%
Positive BV/share change while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.06%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.