PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.55%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-29.83%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-19.91%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-19.91%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-18.31%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-10.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-11.11%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
4.01%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 4.42%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
-0.11%
Reduced diluted shares while RGLD is at 4.40%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.69%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 107.30%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-41.69%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 202.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
115.32%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 2100.42%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
59.36%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 134.58%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
46.89%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 46.65%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
580.66%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 454.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
89.09%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 92.51%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
506.67%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 161.12%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
114.08%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 17.09%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
934.37%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 1325.40%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
1372.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 286.59%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
249.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 103.95%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-83.67%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.63%
Negative asset growth while RGLD invests at 2.02%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.58%
Positive BV/share change while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-27.61%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 22.22%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.67%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.