PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.79%
Revenue growth similar to RGLD's 33.04%. Walter Schloss would see if both companies share industry tailwinds.
45.14%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 26.00%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
50.25%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 41.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
50.25%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 41.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
51.37%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 34.93%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
36.36%
EPS growth similar to RGLD's 33.33%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
36.36%
Similar diluted EPS growth to RGLD's 35.29%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
9.22%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.19%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
9.14%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.25%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
56.41%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
140.85%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
235.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 401.65%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm’s offerings lag behind the competitor.
179.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 195.42%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
33.83%
3Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 57.20%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags behind competitor innovations.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
399.61%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 78.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
53.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 28.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
290.55%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 88.36%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
37.95%
Positive short-term CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
251.55%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 351.94%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
73.36%
Below 50% of RGLD's 159.90%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.21%
Firm’s AR is declining while RGLD shows 45.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Negative asset growth while RGLD invests at 1.37%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-4.17%
We have a declining book value while RGLD shows 1.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-52.05%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
SG&A declining or stable vs. RGLD's 35.40%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.