95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.91%
Negative revenue growth while RGLD stands at 8.76%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.35%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-3.96%
Negative EBIT growth while RGLD is at 8.19%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-3.96%
Negative operating income growth while RGLD is at 8.19%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-8.80%
Negative net income growth while RGLD stands at 3.72%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.52%
Negative EPS growth while RGLD is at 4.20%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-9.52%
Negative diluted EPS growth while RGLD is at 2.19%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 0.12%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.03%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 0.15%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
0.02%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while RGLD cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-0.62%
Negative OCF growth while RGLD is at 3.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-82.43%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 4.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
56.04%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 638.04%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
176.47%
5Y revenue/share CAGR similar to RGLD's 177.53%. Walter Schloss might see both companies benefiting from the same mid-term trends.
229.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 146.49%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
12196.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 1134.23%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
268.99%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 152.31%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
426.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 31.51%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
10696.01%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 1858.79% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
273.92%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 93.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
367.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 140.56%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
2022.77%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 2805.21%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
155.80%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 280.89%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
97.53%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 86.55%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.73%
AR growth well above RGLD's 12.19%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.66%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.38%
BV/share growth above 1.5x RGLD's 0.96%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-7.69%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.94%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.