95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.05%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RGLD's 1.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
4.81%
Gross profit growth at 75-90% of RGLD's 6.40%. Bill Ackman would demand operational improvements to match competitor gains.
3.70%
EBIT growth below 50% of RGLD's 8.81%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.70%
Operating income growth under 50% of RGLD's 8.81%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
1.68%
Net income growth under 50% of RGLD's 11.05%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
2.44%
EPS growth at 50-75% of RGLD's 4.76%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 28.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
0.08%
OCF growth under 50% of RGLD's 62.21%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
0.03%
FCF growth under 50% of RGLD's 101.67%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
723.13%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 574.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
182.60%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 153.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
306.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 93.17%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
640.28%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 755.28%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
242.27%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to RGLD's 241.41%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
441.69%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of RGLD's 3522.76%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
581.35%
Net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 397.81%. Bruce Berkowitz might see more effective use of capital or consistently better margins over time.
268.71%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 208.35%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
644.65%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 262.10%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
3089.26%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 2665.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
147.25%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of RGLD's 278.48%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
86.70%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 101.68%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.82%
Our AR growth while RGLD is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.65%
Asset growth at 75-90% of RGLD's 5.74%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
4.10%
Under 50% of RGLD's 11.83%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-9.08%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
28.17%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.