95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
78.11%
Revenue growth above 1.5x RGLD's 2.58%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
56.56%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x RGLD's 4.95%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
56.27%
EBIT growth above 1.5x RGLD's 6.34%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
56.27%
Operating income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 6.34%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
48.49%
Net income growth above 1.5x RGLD's 9.87%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
47.06%
EPS growth of 47.06% while RGLD is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
47.06%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x RGLD's 2.44%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.14%
Share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 7.58%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.13%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 7.47%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-30.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
97.45%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
149.53%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
747.55%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 679.09%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
260.22%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 152.86%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
206.39%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 45.90%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
10355.24%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 26.50%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
365.07%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 31.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
245.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
9636.81%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 571.59% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
349.98%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 174.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
237.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 79.64%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
3155.98%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 906.00%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
150.22%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 127.39%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
74.09%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of RGLD's 95.09%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.01%
Firm’s AR is declining while RGLD shows 20.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
4.69%
Asset growth well under 50% of RGLD's 20.13%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
4.28%
Under 50% of RGLD's 16.94%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-12.48%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 0.76%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
We expand SG&A while RGLD cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.