PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.29%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-0.43%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.43%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.43%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
8.35%
Net income growth under 50% of RGLD's 41.97%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
10.00%
EPS growth under 50% of RGLD's 37.65%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of RGLD's 37.97%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.26%
Share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 1.26%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.21%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x RGLD's 1.21%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-61.46%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-5.26%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
29250.87%
Positive FCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
369.06%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 331.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
194.35%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 83.76%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
73.48%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 5.63%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1883.30%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 377.14%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
271.01%
Positive OCF/share growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
62.94%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1508.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 261.02% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
165.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 38.26%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
7.72%
3Y net income/share CAGR 75-90% of RGLD's 8.89%. Bill Ackman might push for an operational plan to match or beat the competitor’s short-term growth.
3689.21%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 877.51%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
157.40%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with RGLD's 152.85%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
62.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 41.28%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.62%
AR growth well above RGLD's 10.35%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.06%
Positive asset growth while RGLD is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.94%
Positive BV/share change while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-9.00%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 0.77%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.09%
We cut SG&A while RGLD invests at 38.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.