PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.61%
Positive revenue growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-0.39%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-0.39%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
21.86%
Positive net income growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
18.18%
Positive EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
18.18%
Positive diluted EPS growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.48%
Share count expansion well above RGLD's 0.06%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.39%
Diluted share count expanding well above RGLD's 0.02%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-10.15%
Dividend reduction while RGLD stands at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
4.99%
Positive OCF growth while RGLD is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
-6.13%
Negative FCF growth while RGLD is at 376.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
238.75%
Similar 10Y revenue/share CAGR to RGLD's 232.46%. Walter Schloss might see both firms benefiting from the same long-term demand.
241.38%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 88.91%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
10.52%
Positive 3Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
110932.14%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 241.78%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
343.50%
Below 50% of RGLD's 2835.15%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-1.33%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while RGLD stands at 8.58%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
1134.29%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 49.96% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
242.41%
Positive 5Y CAGR while RGLD is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-24.60%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
3212.75%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x RGLD's 855.46%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
186.70%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 141.98%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms if reinvested profits or buybacks explain the superior buildup.
46.96%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x RGLD's 39.52%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.02%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-100.00%
Inventory is declining while RGLD stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-0.20%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
0.91%
Positive BV/share change while RGLD is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-4.02%
We’re deleveraging while RGLD stands at 0.78%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.28%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.